You have just been appointed the Director of Undergraduate Admissions at the University of Michigan.  You have been told to revamp the undergraduate admissions system in light of the Supreme Court opinions in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger.  The University typically receives about 25,000 applications for admission to its freshman class and it admits about 50 percent of these to produce a class of 5,000 students. It has employed about 17 full-time undergraduate admissions counselors to read admissions files for an initial read under its now unconstitutional point-based admissions system. In the past, these counselors used academic achievement (including high school grades, scores on standardized tests, quality of high school curriculum, and competitiveness of high school) in addition to a variety of factors including race that added a specific numbers of points to a students admissions score. Borderline files were sent to a faculty admissions committee for further review.  

How would you change the admissions system while still trying to achieve the goal of a more racially diverse student body?